Crosswalk Accidents: Pedestrian Right-of-Way in Georgia

On this page

Georgia’s crosswalk rule is not a suggestion to yield. A driver must stop and stay stopped while a pedestrian crosses, and the duty attaches at every intersection, including those with no paint on the pavement. When a pedestrian is struck inside a crosswalk, the question of who had the right-of-way is usually answered by statute before any argument about damages begins. But the same body of law also imposes duties on pedestrians, and Georgia’s comparative-fault system means the answer is rarely all-or-nothing.

The Statutory Duty to Stop and Stay Stopped

The governing rule is OCGA 40-6-91. The driver of a vehicle must stop and remain stopped to allow a pedestrian to cross within a crosswalk when the pedestrian is on the half of the roadway on which the vehicle is traveling, or is approaching from within one lane of that half. The duty is not satisfied by slowing or easing past; the vehicle stops and stays stopped until the pedestrian clears the relevant portion of the roadway.

Critically, the statute reaches marked and unmarked crosswalks alike. A marked crosswalk has painted lines; an unmarked crosswalk exists at an intersection where sidewalks or pedestrian paths would logically connect, even with no markings at all. The absence of paint does not lower the driver’s duty. If an intersection exists, a crosswalk exists, and a pedestrian crossing there carries the same right-of-way as one crossing between painted lines.

A Companion Hazard: Passing a Stopped Vehicle

One subsection of the same statute addresses a recurring and dangerous pattern. Under OCGA 40-6-91(d), when a vehicle is stopped at a crosswalk to let a pedestrian cross, a vehicle approaching from the rear may not overtake and pass the stopped vehicle. The danger is structural: the passing driver cannot see the pedestrian the first vehicle stopped for. A collision in that posture is strong evidence of a statutory violation, because the maneuver itself is prohibited.

Where the Pedestrian’s Own Duties Begin

The right-of-way is not unconditional. OCGA 40-6-91(b) provides that a pedestrian may not suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle so close that the driver cannot practically yield. A pedestrian who darts in front of a moving car that has no chance to stop shares responsibility for the collision.

Outside crosswalks, the balance shifts. OCGA 40-6-92 requires a pedestrian crossing at a point other than a crosswalk to yield the right-of-way to vehicles, and between adjacent signalized intersections to use a marked crosswalk. Crossing outside a crosswalk, often loosely called jaywalking, is not itself an enumerated crime in Georgia, but it reduces the pedestrian’s right-of-way and reshapes the fault analysis.

The contrast can be set out plainly:

Crossing location Right-of-way Statute
Marked or unmarked crosswalk Driver must stop and remain stopped OCGA 40-6-91
Sudden entry from curb into close traffic Pedestrian must not create an impractical situation OCGA 40-6-91(b)
Outside a crosswalk (mid-block) Pedestrian must yield to vehicles OCGA 40-6-92

The Violation as Negligence Per Se

When a driver strikes a pedestrian who was lawfully within a crosswalk, the driver has typically violated OCGA 40-6-91. That violation can establish negligence per se, meaning the statutory breach itself supplies the breach-of-duty element rather than requiring a separate showing of unreasonable conduct. The injured pedestrian must still prove that the violation caused the injury and the extent of the harm, but the core liability question is largely answered by the statute. A driver’s familiar refrain that the pedestrian was not visible runs into evidence that a reasonable driver, keeping the required lookout, would have seen the person.

How Comparative Fault Divides the Outcome

Georgia’s modified comparative negligence rule allocates fault among the parties. A pedestrian less than fifty percent at fault recovers, with the award reduced by the assigned percentage; a pedestrian fifty percent or more at fault recovers nothing. The full operation of the 50% bar and apportionment belongs to the comparative-negligence post and is not re-explained here. Typical defense themes assign pedestrian fault for crossing against a signal, stepping in suddenly, looking at a phone, or wearing dark clothing at night. These can reduce a recovery, but they do not erase a driver’s liability where the driver failed the stop-and-remain-stopped duty.

A short illustration shows the arithmetic of the reduction without implying any value. If a fact-finder fixes a pedestrian’s total damages at 100,000 dollars and assigns the pedestrian twenty percent of the fault, the recovery is reduced by that twenty percent to 80,000 dollars. Cross the fifty-percent line and the recovery is zero. The figures illustrate the mechanism only.

Reasonable-Value and Anchoring Rules Frame Pedestrian Bills

SB 68 (2025) does not alter the crosswalk right-of-way rules, but two of its provisions touch the damages side of a pedestrian case. Recovery for medical expenses is now limited to the reasonable value of necessary care, with both billed charges and the amounts actually paid admissible (OCGA 51-12-1.1, enacted by SB 68); because pedestrian impacts often produce serious orthopedic and head injuries with large bills, the reasonable-value standard directly frames the medical claim. The anchoring provision separately restricts how a pain-and-suffering figure may be argued, allowing it only in closing, only if supported by evidence, and barring a specific number in closing unless introduced in opening.

Deadlines in Pedestrian Cases

A pedestrian injury claim is subject to Georgia’s two-year personal-injury limitation under OCGA 9-3-33, running from the date of the collision. Where the pedestrian dies, a wrongful-death period runs from the date of death rather than the date of the incident. The statute-of-limitations post addresses tolling and exceptions in detail.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do Georgia drivers have to stop at unmarked crosswalks?
Yes. Under OCGA 40-6-91, the stop-and-remain-stopped duty applies at unmarked crosswalks at intersections, not only at painted ones. A crosswalk exists wherever an intersection exists.

Can a pedestrian recover after crossing outside a crosswalk?
Sometimes. Under OCGA 40-6-92 the pedestrian must yield outside a crosswalk, which increases the pedestrian’s share of fault, but a driver who fails to exercise ordinary care may still bear liability. Recovery depends on the comparative-fault allocation.

Is jaywalking illegal in Georgia?
Crossing outside a crosswalk is not an enumerated crime, but it reduces the pedestrian’s right-of-way under OCGA 40-6-92 and can increase the pedestrian’s percentage of fault in a damages analysis.

Does SB 68 change a pedestrian’s compensation?
It does not change the right-of-way rules, but it limits medical-expense recovery to the reasonable value of necessary care (OCGA 51-12-1.1) and restricts how a pain-and-suffering figure may be argued at trial.

  • OCGA 40-6-91 (driver duty to stop and remain stopped; unmarked crosswalks; passing a stopped vehicle)
  • OCGA 40-6-92 (pedestrian crossing outside crosswalk must yield)
  • OCGA 51-12-33 (modified comparative negligence; apportionment)
  • OCGA 51-12-1.1 (reasonable value of medical specials, enacted by SB 68)
  • OCGA 9-3-33 (two-year limitation for personal injury)
  • SB 68 (2025), anchoring and medical-specials provisions, effective for claims arising on or after April 21, 2025

Disclaimer

This article is general information about Georgia law and is not legal advice. A crosswalk case turns on the location, the conduct of the driver and pedestrian, the available evidence, and current Georgia deadlines. A person involved in such an incident should consult a licensed Georgia attorney about the particular circumstances.